Securities Docket Report for October 21, 2021
Docket Report
Securities Report October 21, 2021
Unambiguous Written Provisions Bar Fraud Claims Premised on Contrary Oral Representations
[E]ven assuming Camelart's new allegations satisfy Rule 9(b) and amount to an oral promise to always provide margin calls and reasonable time to satisfy them, the fact remains that its contract with StoneX expressly provided StoneX with the right "in its sole discretion, to liquidate all or any part of [Camelart's] positions through any means available, without prior notice" in the event Camelart's account was under-margined, notwithstanding anything in the contract to the contrary. [] Unambiguous written provisions control over oral statements to the contrary and bar fraud claims premised on the latter. See Carr v. CIGNA Secs., Inc., 95 F.3d 544, 547 (7th Cir. 1996) ("If a literate, competent adult is given a document that in readable and comprehensible prose says X (X might be, 'this is a risky investment'), and the person who hands it to him tells him, orally, not-X ('this is a safe investment'), our literate, competent adult cannot maintain an action for fraud against the issuer of the document.")[.] . . . The liquidation provisions in the parties' contract forecloses Camelart's reliance on purported oral representations to the contrary.
Camelart Limited v. StoneX Group Inc. f/k/a INTL FCStone Financial, Inc., 1-20-cv-07707 (NDIL 2021-10-19, Order) (Thomas M. Durkin)
 
Read Order     Docket Sheet
 
Delivered to %%FullName_%% under an individual license and subject to restrictions on dissemination. Please review Terms of Use before forwarding.
 
United States District Courts
 
17   New cases
1   Case with new pleadings
31   New orders and notices
 
 
USDC New Cases 17 Result[s]
 
DDE Wilhelm v. Kadmon Holdings, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-01470 October 19, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Arthur Kirsch
Cynthia Schwalm
David E. Cohen
Eugene Bauer
Harlan W. Waksal
Kadmon Holdings, Inc.
Nancy Miller-Rich
Tasos G. Konidaris
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Robert Wilhelm
Long Law
   Brian D Long
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Rosenblatt v. Square, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-01471 October 19, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Amy Brooks
Anna Patterson
Darren Walker
David Viniar
Jack Dorsey
James McKelvey
Lawrence Summers
Mary Meeker
Paul Deighton
Randy Garutti
 
View 3 more in case profile ➞
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Jordan Rosenblatt
Long Law
   Brian D Long
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Jacobs v. NortonLifeLock Inc. et al
1-21-cv-01472 October 19, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Emily Heath
Eric K. Brandt
Frank E. Dangeard
Kenneth Y. Hao
Nora M. Denzel
NortonLifeLock Inc.
Peter A. Feld
Sherrese M. Smith
Susan P. Barsamian
Vincent Pilette
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Stanley Jacobs
Long Law
   Brian D Long
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Wilson v. Acceleron Pharma, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-01473 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Acceleron Pharma Inc.
Christopher Hite
Francois Nader
Habib J. Dable
Joseph S. Zakrzewski
Karen L. Smith
Kemal Malik
Laura J. Hamill
Terrence C. Kearney
Thomas A. McCourt
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Jordan Wilson
Long Law
   Brian D Long
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Jones v. The ExOne Company et al
1-21-cv-01474 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Bonnie K. Wachtel
Gregory F. Pashke
John F. Hartner
John Irvin
Paul A. Camuti
Roger W. Thiltgen
S. Kent Rockwell
The ExOne Company
William F. Strome
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Brian Jones
Long Law
   Brian D Long
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
EDNY Horowitz v. Inotiv, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-05858 October 21, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Gregory C. Davis
Inotiv, Inc.
John E. Sagartz
Richard A. Johnson
R. Matthew Neff
Robert Leasure, Jr.
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Lee Horowitz
Halper Sadeh
   Daniel Sadeh
   Zachary Halper
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY US Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernardi et al
1-21-cv-08598 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 17 of the Securities Act
   Violations of Section 10 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Chandra Sunil
Daniel Bernardi
Jenifer Bernardi
Nihat Cardak
Olson Diane
Robert Bernardi
 
 
PLAINTIFF
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission
   Melissa J Armstrong
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Anderson v. VICI Properties Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08603 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Craig MacNab
Diana F. Cantor
Edward B. Pitoniak
Elizabeth I. Holland
James R Abrahamson
Michael D. Rumbolz
Monica H. Douglas
VICI Properties Inc.
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Jerome Anderson
Rowley Law
   Danielle Rowland Lindahl
   Shane T Rowley
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Dunlap v. Square, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08612 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Amy Brooks
Anna Patterson
Darren Walker
David Viniar
Jack Dorsey
James McKelvey
Lawrence Summers
Mary Meeker
Paul Deighton
Randy Garutti
 
View 3 more in case profile ➞
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Gary Dunlap
Lifshitz Law Firm
   Joshua M Lifshitz
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Zapo v. NortonLifeLock Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08614 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Emily Heath
Eric K. Brandt
Frank E. Dangeard
Kenneth Y. Hao
Nora Denzel
NortonLifeLock Inc.
Peter A. Feld
Sherrese M. Smith
Sue Barsamian
Vincent Pilette
 
 
PLAINTIFF
George Zapo
Brodsky Smith
   Evan J Smith
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Finger v. Acceleron Pharma Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08615 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Acceleron Pharma Inc.
Christopher Hite
Francois Nader
Habib J. Dable
Joseph S. Zakrzewski
Karen L. Smith
Kemal Malik
Laura J. Hamill
Terrence C. Kearney
Thomas A. McCourt
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Susan Finger
WeissLaw
   Richard A Acocelli
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Florio v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08618 October 20, 2021
Claims: Class Action
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 10 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Morgan Stanley
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Travis Florio
Scott + Scott Attorneys at Law
   Jonathan M Zimmerman
   Rhiana L Swartz
   Thomas L Laughlin, IV
Hedin Hall
   Armen Zohrabian
   Arun Ravindran
   David W Hall
Schall Law Firm
   Brian J Schall
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Brown v. VICI Properties, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08621 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Craig MacNab
Diana Cantor
Edward D. Pitoniak
Elizabeth I. Holland
James R Abrahamson
Michael D. Rumbolz
Monica Howard Douglas
VICI Properties Inc.
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Reginald Brown
Monteverde & Associates
   Juan E Monteverde
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Cha v. CarLotz, Inc. et al
1-21-cv-08623 October 20, 2021
Claims: Stockholder Derivative
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 21 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 10 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
CarLotz, Inc.
David R. Mitchell
James E. Skinner
Kimberly H. Sheehy
Linda B. Abraham
Luis Ignacio Solorzano Aizpuru
Michael W. Bor
Sarah M. Kauss
Steven G. Carrel
Thomas W. Stoltz
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Julian Cha
Brown Law Firm
   Saadia Hashmi
   Timothy Brown
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
EDPA Whitfield v. Kadmon Holdings, Inc. et al
2-21-cv-04605 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Arthur Kirsch
Cynthia Schwalm
David E. Cohen
Eugene Bauer
Harlan W. Waksal
Kadmon Holdings, Inc.
Nancy Miller-Rich
Tasos G. Konidaris
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Matthew Whitfield
Grabar Law Office
   Joshua H Grabar
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
EDPA Justice, II v. The ExOne Company et al
2-21-cv-04607 October 20, 2021
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of Section 14 of the Exchange Act
   Violations of Section 20 of the Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Bonnie K. Wachtel
Gregory F. Pashke
John Hartner
John Irvin
Paul Camuti
Roger W. Thiltgen
S. Kent Rockwell
The ExOne Company
William F. Strome
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Grabar Law Office
   Joshua H Grabar
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDTX Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Coquest Inc. et al
3-21-cv-02599 October 20, 2021
District Judge Karen Gren Scholer
 
Claims: Complaint
   Violations of the Commodity Exchange Act
 
DEFENDANTS
 
Buttonwood LLC
Coquest Inc.
Dennis Weinmann
John Vassallo
Weva Properties Ltd.
 
 
PLAINTIFF
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
   David A Terrell
   Douglas Gene Snodgrass
   Scott R Williamson
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
USDC Cases with New Pleadings 1 Result[s]
 
DMD Lucey v. Paucek et al pdf
1-20-cv-02424 October 19, 2021
  REDACTED DOCUMENT to 19 Amended Complaint by Thomas Lucey(Sachs Michaels, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
USDC New Orders and Notices 31 Result[s]
 
CDCA Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pacific West Capital Group, Inc. et al pdf
2-15-cv-02563 October 19, 2021
  ORDER GRANTING FOURTEENTH INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF THE RECEIVER FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, 437 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: IT IS ORDERED that the Receiver's Application is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver's fees and costs for the Fourteenth Application Period are allowed and approved, on an interim basis, in the amounts of $28,678.95 and $1,620.57, respectively. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver is authorized and directed to pay himself $22,943.16 in fees and $1,620.57 in costs from assets of the receivership estate, which amount reflects an interim payment of 80% of the allowed fees and 100% of the allowed costs. (shb) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pacific West Capital Group, Inc. et al pdf
2-15-cv-02563 October 19, 2021
  ORDER GRANTING FOURTEENTH INTERIM APPLICATION OF ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS, LLP, GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE RECEIVER, FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, 438 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: IT IS ORDERED that the Application of Allen Matkins is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Allen Matkins' fees and costs for the Fourteenth Application Period are allowed and approved, on an interim basis, in the amounts of $37,010.70 and $2,754.35, respectively. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver is authorized and directed to pay Allen Matkins $29,608.56 in fees and $2,754.35 in costs from assets of the receivership estate, which amounts reflect an interim payment of 80% of the allowed fees and 100% of the allowed costs. (shb) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA Kristopher Baylog et al v. HashFlare LP pdf
2-18-cv-03043 October 19, 2021
  ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARDS, [83, 84] by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and personal jurisdiction over all parties to the action including all members of the Settlement Class. The Unopposed Motion for Final Approval and the Unopposed Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Class Representative Service Award are hereby GRANTED. The Court GRANTS Class Counsel's request for an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $67,500.00, and costs in the amount of $38,196.23 for litigation expenses and $18,590.00 for settlement administrative expenses. The Court finds that the requested attorneys fees (thirty percent of the common fund) are authorized by the Settlement Agreement and are reasonable in light of the factors considered by the courts in California and the Ninth Circuit. The Court Approves Class Counsel's request for service awards for each of the Class Representatives. The Court approves an award of $15,000 to each Class Representatives Kristopher Baylor and Misael Marrero. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further information. (shb) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA Gilberto Ferreira v. Funko, Inc. et al pdf
2-20-cv-02319 October 18, 2021
  MINUTES OF Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants(Dkt. 149-152) held before Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The Court issues its tentative ruling prior to the hearing. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court hears oral argument and takes the matter under submission. The Court will issue an Order. Court Reporter: Myra Ponce. (shb) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA Walter Ponce-Sanchez v. HF Foods Group Inc. et al pdf
2-20-cv-03967 October 19, 2021
  MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to Plaintiffs Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 38 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA Securities and Exchange Commission v. Peter H. Pocklington et al pdf
5-18-cv-00701 October 19, 2021
  (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On October 14, 2021, Plaintiff the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and Defendant Robert A. Vanetten ("Vanetten") filed a stipulated Proposed Final Judgment as to Defendant Robert A. Vanetten ("Proposed Judgment"). (Dkt. [152-1]). The Proposed Judgment states on page 2, "Defendant Robert A. Vanetten... consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph VII)..." Id. at 2. The Proposed Judgment does not include "paragraph VII," and, therefore, the court is unable to assess which allegations of the Complaint Defendant Vanetten has admitted or denied. The court, therefore, DENIES the parties' stipulated Proposed Judgment without prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
CDCA James D. McCool v. Denise Wilson et al pdf
5-19-cv-02499 October 19, 2021
  MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): The Court DENIES Defendant's ex parte application 176 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court DENIES the ex parte application. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDCA Jenkins v. Trueman et al pdf
3-19-cv-08350 October 19, 2021
  ORDER re Motions in Limine. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2021) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDCA Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund et al v. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft et al pdf
3-20-cv-04737 October 19, 2021
  ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/19/2021.(rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2021) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDCA Gonzales v. Adams et al pdf
3-21-cv-05197 October 19, 2021
  ORDER by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg denying 18 Stipulation. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2021) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Wigginton v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al pdf
1-18-cv-00212 October 19, 2021
  ORAL ORDER Re: D.I. 270 : The transcript of the October 18, 2021, discovery dispute teleconference shall serve as the Order of the court. In accordance with the rulings explained on the record, Plaintiff&#39s Motion to Compel Defendants to supplement responses to Plaintiff&#39s Third Set of Interrogatories at numbers 8-12, 19, and 20 (D.I. 281 , Ex. 3) is DENIED. The interrogatories in issue were served 30 days before the close of fact discovery. The parties are now fully engaged in briefing of summary judgment and Daubert motions, and the interrogatories in issue do not relate to any new discovery developments that could not have been fully explored earlier in the fact discovery period. The court has discretion over its case management not to re-open fact discovery that could potentially disrupt completion of briefing on dispositive motions, re-open expert discovery, or negatively impact the trial schedule. See, e.g., Finizie v. Shineski, 351 Fed. App&#39x 668, 672 & n.7 (3d Cir. 2009). Notwithstanding the timeliness ruling, the Defendants&#39 objections to the interrogatories are sustained. (D.I. 282 ) The interrogatories in issue are facially defective because they are overbroad and untethered to specific information they seek to elicit in the referenced exhibits (Interrogatory 8); depend upon an incorrectly phrased factual premise (Interrogatories 9-12); and are overbroad and untethered to the specific relevant surviving claims as determined by the District Judge in the court&#39s Memorandum Opinion ([D.I. 73], at 13 n.4) (Interrogatories 19-20). Ordered by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/18/2021. (lih) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Gensemer v. Lo et al pdf
1-21-cv-00168 October 19, 2021
  SO ORDERED re 6 Stipulation of Dismissal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/19/2021. (dlw) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Walker v. Iconix Brand Group, Inc. et al pdf
1-21-cv-01048 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Matthew Walker (Long, Brian) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DDE Plumley v. Veoneer, Inc. et al pdf
1-21-cv-01312 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Patrick Plumley (Long, Brian) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDFL Securities and Exchange Commission v. Quiros et al pdf
1-16-cv-21301 October 19, 2021
  ORDER APPROVING 700 Receiver's Tenth Interim Omnibus Application for Allowance and Payment of Professionals' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses for September 1, 2020-July 31, 2021. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (hs01) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDIL Holwill v. AbbVie Inc. et al pdf
1-18-cv-06790 October 19, 2021
  CERTIFIED copy of order dated 10/19/2021 from the 7th Circuit regarding Appellate case no. : 21-8031; The following are before the court: 1. PETITION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 23(f) FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER, filed on October 7, 2021, by counsel for the petitioner. 2. OPPOSITION TO PETITION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. 23(f) FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER AND ACCOMPANYING SPECIAL APPENDIX, filed on October 18, 2021, by counsel to the petitioner. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for permission to appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) is DENIED. (bg, ) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDIL Camelart Limited v. StoneX Group Inc. f/k/a INTL FCStone Financial, Inc. pdf
1-20-cv-07707 October 19, 2021
  MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, StoneX's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint 27 is granted. There appearing no set of facts that Camelart can plead to establish a plausible claim for relief and having already afforded Camelart with an opportunity to amend, Counts I-V of the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/19/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
NDIL Camelart Limited v. StoneX Group Inc. f/k/a INTL FCStone Financial, Inc. pdf
1-20-cv-07707 October 19, 2021
  ENTERED JUDGMENT on 10/19/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DMA Myers v. Sesen Bio, Inc. et al pdf
1-21-cv-11538 October 19, 2021
  Judge Richard G. Stearns: ENDORSED ORDER entered re 4 Joint Stipulation and Order Consolidating Related Shareholder Derivative Actions and Establishing a Leadership Structure. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DMD Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jacoby, et al pdf
1-17-cv-03230 October 19, 2021
  ORDER Granting 229 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/19/2021. (bas, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
DNJ IN RE CONDUENT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION pdf
2-19-cv-08237 October 19, 2021
  ORDER that Defendants shall apply the following search terms to the electronically-stored information of the 25 agreed-upon custodians for the time period January 1, 2017 to November 6, 2018:etc.; that the Court will hold a telephonic status conference on January 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. using the Courts teleconference line;etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 10/19/2021. (ld, ) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Boxhorn v. Rodgers Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp. et al pdf
1-21-cv-02900 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Steven J. Gomo, Emmanuel T. Hernandez, Lisan Hung, Joseph I. Malchow, John D. McCranie, Thurman J. Rodgers, Rodgers Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp.. Document filed by Derek Boxhorn. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Monteverde, Juan) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Wang v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al pdf
1-21-cv-05672 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Cimarex Energy Co., Paul N. Eckley, Hans Helmerich, Kathleen A. Hogenson, Thomas E. Jorden, Harold R. Logan, Jr, Floyd R. Price, Monroe W. Robertson, Lisa A. Stewart, Frances M. Vallejo. Document filed by Elaine Wang. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Melwani, Gloria) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Upton v. VEREIT, Inc. et al pdf
1-21-cv-06129 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Priscilla Almodovar, Hugh R. Frater, David B. Henry, Richard J. Lieb, Eugene A. Pinover, Mary Hogan Preusse, Julie G. Richardson, Glenn J. Rufrano, Susan E. Skerritt, VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P., VEREIT, Inc.. Document filed by Taylor Upton. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Monteverde, Juan) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Lukosevicius v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al pdf
1-21-cv-06568 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Cimarex Energy Co., Paul N. Eckley, Hans Helmerich, Kathleen A. Hogenson, Thomas E. Jorden, Harold R. Logan, Jr, Floyd R. Price, Monroe W. Robertson, Lisa A. Stewart, Frances M. Vallejo. Document filed by Pijus Lukosevicius. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Monteverde, Juan) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Jones v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al pdf
1-21-cv-07798 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Joseph R. Albi, Cimarex Energy Co., Paul N. Eckley, Hans Helmerich, Kathleen A. Hogenson, Thomas E. Jorden, Harold R. Logan, Jr, Floyd R. Price, Monroe W. Robertson, Lisa A. Stewart, Frances M. Vallejo. Document filed by Brian Jones. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Engel, Shallom) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
SDNY Dolan v. Medallia, Inc. et al pdf
1-21-cv-07995 October 19, 2021
  NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Timothy Dolan ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action") without prejudice. Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 10/18/2021) (vfr) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
EDPA SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Lahr et al pdf
5-20-cv-01593 October 19, 2021
  ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONDUCT THE HEARING TELEPHONICALLY (DOC. NO. {42}) IS DENIED. THE COURT'S HEARING ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2021, AT 3:00 P.M. WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AT THE HOLMES BUILDING, 101 LARRY HOLMES DRIVE, 4TH FLOOR, EASTON, PENNSYLVANIA 18042. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/19/21. 10/19/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, ) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
WDPA VRAKAS v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al pdf
2-17-cv-00579 October 19, 2021
  ORDER denying without prejudice the Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal 312 for non-compliance with the Court's sealing procedures. (See WDPA Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/ECFPolProcAmended122016.pdf.) Additionally, the Motion does not contain sufficient information for the Court to assess whether the referenced discovery materials should be sealed under the Third Circuit's governing standards enunciated in In re Avandia Marketing Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation, 924 F.3d 662, 670-73 (3d Cir. 2019). Rather, the Court is left wondering why should the public be denied access to documents reflecting transactions in the securities of a publicly traded company. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/19/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (ahm) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
WDTX Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Tinoco et al pdf
3-21-cv-00237 October 19, 2021
  ORDER GRANTING 17 PETITION TO HOLD PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARINGREMOTELY; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff CFTC's "Emergency Petition to HoldPreliminary Injunction Hearing Remotely" (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED and that the preliminary injunction hearing set for October 20, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. will be held via Zoom Vidco Confercncc unless the parties later request, and the Court later orders, otherwise. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (em) (Entered: 10/19/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
WDTX Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Tinoco et al pdf
3-21-cv-00237 October 18, 2021
  Sealed Order. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (em) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
 
Create Docket Alert View Case Profile
 
 
To avoid missing an issue add docketreport@docketnavigator.com to your address book.
 
CONTACT US  |  TRAINING CENTER  |  MANAGE ACCOUNT
 
Docket Navigator
 
Copyright © 2021 by Hopkins Bruce Publishers, Corp. No claim to copyright as to original U.S. government work. Receipt and use of the Docket Navigator Docket Report™ is subject to your agreement to the Terms of UsePatents.